An introduction of different social issues through michael moores documentary bowling for columbine

His presentation is not, as some critics have argued, a simple-minded argument for gun control. Heston briefly alludes to ethnic divisions in the U. Disagreement is often perceived as a personal attack, and this defensiveness is carried over to issues of property and personal security.

Michael Moore's 'Bowling for Columbine' (2002)

But most importantly, they are always the ones depicted on the media causing crimes. That Canada can afford to support its less fortunate, while the U.

That was just a way to introduce the subject of violence.

Persuasive Article – Bowling for Columbine – Michael Moore

Moore does not resort to ad hominem attacks, but respectfully asks these men to defend or reconsider their position on social issues. Punk rock music, Marilyn Manson, violent video games and action movies were also put to blame in the documentary.

Moore asks a woman who leaves her door unlocked if she has ever been burglarized. Pursuing the implications of this unexpected discovery, Moore looks for cultural differences that might account for the disparity in gun violence rates. That said, the film was not exactly about violence either because at the base of this documentary was the impression that America is just not fair.

If someone really wanted a gun and wanted to commit a crime, all they would have to do is either steal it or get it from someone they know. Heston offers two possibilities already discussed in the documentary: Instead, he walks away without speaking, and does not turn when Moore tries to show him a picture of the girl who was killed in Flint.

While one can point to flaws in his ideas, it is hard to completely oppose his points. Canadians are not fiercely divided against one another, racially or socially, nor do they instinctively respond to strange or unexpected house calls with fear and anger.

We can write a custom essay According to Your Specific Requirements. Later investigations showed that this was based on mistaken recollections, and Glenn Moore of the Golden Police Department concluded that they were absent from school on the day of the attack.

Contrary to the picture that militant gun advocates might want to paint of him, Moore dares to contradict the idea that gun violence is proportional to gun ownership.

He makes extremely interesting connections between events. Moore denied that this sequence was staged but acknowledged the timing of events was compressed for production reasons. Living with relatives--one of whom did have a gun--the boy found the gun and took it to school. It is implied that the presence of this facility within the community, and the acceptance of institutionalized violence as a solution to conflict, contributed to the mindset that led to the massacre.


Moore explores these divisions in his study of a six-year-old girl killed by a handgun in Flint, Michigan. The point is that America is violent and it is not the only country with guns. For Moore, this sense of justice is clear, but for others, that is not necessarily the case.

In fact, his discussion of gun usage in Canada undermines standard gun control apologetics, evincing a much more thoughtful and nuanced analysis than his critics accredit to him.

Even in his dealings with the K-mart executives, he was much less confrontational than he might have been, and he expressed his gratitude when K-mart made policy changes that exceeded his expectations.

This fact provokes Moore to examine what is so different about the U.

Michael Moore’s Documentary Film “Bowling for Columbine” Essay Sample

They claim that there is a trickle down effect or that the private sector will pick up the slack. The mere asking of the question is sufficient to identify Moore as an adversary, and cause these men to withdraw into their gilded cocoons.

Only in the U. Of course, critics [David Hardy, et al. But the film was really not about the Columbine massacre. The following is a transcript of the onscreen text in the Wonderful World segment:Social Issues Essays: An Analysis of Bowling for Columbine. Search Browse Essays ; Join now!

Login; Support; Tweet; Browse Essays / Social Issues; An Analysis of Bowling for Columbine This Essay An Analysis of Bowling for Columbine and other 64, Michael Moore made a political documentary called Bowling For Columbine and in it, 4/4(1).

Bowling for Columbine, directed by Michael Moore, is a successful documentary that positions the audience to view the reasons why Americans have a large number of gun related deaths compared to other countries, such as the nearby country Canada.

Bowling for Columbine is entitled such, in. Michael Moore's enormously successful film "Bowling for Columbine," is a documentary that proposes that there is a connection between gun violence in America and an institutionalized climate of fear.

The film is both humorous and horrifying. However, the film has also raised questions about Moore's. Michael Moore's Big Issue: Bowling for Columbine What is he on about? Michael Moore's documentary is centred on the gun issues in American society as personified by the infamous Columbine High School Massacre which he uses to provide a poignant example of what is wrong with gun violence in America.

Bowling for Columbine is a American documentary film written, produced, directed, and narrated by Michael Moore. The film explores what Moore suggests are the primary causes for the Columbine High School massacre. - Michael Moore´s Bowling For Columbine Bowling For Columbine is a well-directed documentary that informs people about gun violence in America.

Michael Moore is successful in showing that America has been going through many gun tragedies; and portrays the sense that America’s problems are out of control.

An introduction of different social issues through michael moores documentary bowling for columbine
Rated 3/5 based on 94 review