The teaching styles of the apology

Socrates is especially skillful in the questions he asks of his adversary, The teaching styles of the apology the result that Meletus is shown to be contradicting himself and making accusations that are utterly absurd. As a soldier in the army, he did not desert his post when facing the danger of death.

Socratic method

Any prayer that he would address to the deity was never a plea for bodily comfort or material welfare but a petition for the humility and courage to live righteously under whatever circumstances might exist.

Except at Delphi, there was no caste of priestly interpreters. That Socrates was a law-abiding citizen and not an enemy of the state is indicated by his conduct throughout his entire life. This is what Socrates has to say: Socrates concludes his self-defence by saying to the court that he bears no ill-will, neither towards his accusers — Lycon, Anytus, and Meletus — nor the jurors.

Instead, he addressed himself to the larger implications involved in the so-called crimes of which he had been accused. The teaching styles of the apology he probably had no idea that his proposal would be accepted, Socrates explained his reasons for making it.

He did not claim to have arrived at the final or absolute truth himself, nor did he insist that his pupils should hold the same views that he held. This is my teaching, and if this is the doctrine which corrupts the youth, my influence is ruinous indeed.

These tools will provide structure for listening and give the outside members specific details to discuss later in the seminar. In defence of Socrates, his supporters increased the amount of money to pay as a fine, from to 3, drachmae; nonetheless, to the judges of the trial of Socrates, a pecuniary fine was insufficient punishment for the philosopher Socrates, the social gadfly of Classical Athens.

Socrates antagonises the court by proposing, rather than a penalty, a reward — perpetual maintenance at public expense. He asks that they ensure the well-being of his three sons, so that they learn to live ethically. There are certain advantages to be gained by it, and while he has no positive assurance of a life after death, there is a possibility of continued existence under conditions that are far more pleasant than the ones that are now being experienced.

His only purpose was to stimulate and encourage each of them to think for himself. It is the first, or older, accusation that he dreads most of all. Simultaneous Seminars can also be used for a particularly difficult text.

When this was reported to Socrates, he was amazed, for he had never considered himself to be a wise person. Is it that he is teaching them not to acknowledge the gods that the state acknowledges but some other divinities or spiritual agencies in place of them?

Socrates did not accept these stories about the gods. At any rate, he was distrustful of the poets and had little if any faith in the local divinities, although he did take seriously the voice, or daemon, that would speak to him on certain occasions, telling him what not to do.

The story came about in the following manner. The emphasis is on critical and creative thinking. Having finished with his defense, Socrates concludes with a final note of warning to those who have condemned him. By his own admission, he did not accept many of the popular views concerning the Athenian gods, but this was by no means the only reason or even the main one for his being brought to trial.

Students need to be arranged in inner and outer circles. The inner circle engages in discussion about the text.The Teaching Styles of the Apology of Plato an the Gospel of Luke. Words 5 Pages. Socrates and Luke are both considered to be great educators. They have both influenced countless people with their teachings.

However, comparing the two is slightly strange since Socrates is the subject of the story, which is told by Plato, and Luke is. The dialog begins with Socrates making a short speech in which he offers an apology for the colloquial style in which he will be making his defense.

His accusers have warned the judges to be on their guard lest they be deceived by the eloquence of Socrates in his attempt to convince them of his innocence. Teaching people to improve. The Apology of Socrates (Greek: Ἀπολογία Σωκράτους, Apología Sokrátous; Latin: Apologia Socratis), by Plato, is the Socratic dialogue that presents the speech of legal self-defence, which Socrates presented at his trial for impiety and corruption, in BC.

Socrates promoted an alternative method of teaching which came to be called the Socratic method. Socrates began to engage in such discussions with his fellow Athenians Plato famously formalized the Socratic elenctic style in prose—presenting Socrates as the curious questioner of some prominent Athenian interlocutor—in some.

Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, and Phaedo

The Teaching Styles of the Apology of Plato an the Gospel of Luke This kind or reasoning cannot be argued with since it is backed by a god and consequently it is not. Meletus, Socrates' accuser never says a word in rebuttal, or.

essays research papers - The Teaching Styles of the Apology of Plato an the Gospel of Luke.

The teaching styles of the apology
Rated 3/5 based on 48 review